Sponsored By

 




Back to Menu

ESTROGEN USE TAKES A BIG HIT

The media reports based on a July 17, 2002 report from the Women’s Health Initiative in the Journal of the American Medical Association were devastating. If the goal was to frighten and confuse women, they succeeded. The investigators recruited 16,608 women, ages 50 to 79, and randomized them to receive estrogen (0.625 mg per day) plus a progestin or an inactive placebo. After about five years of follow up, the study was stopped because the investigators said the evidence showed that the harms outweighed the benefits.

The adverse effects included heart attacks, strokes, clots in the legs, clots in the legs that spread to the lungs (embolism), and breast cancer. Compared to controls, during the five-year period, 2.4 percent of the women (about 1 in 40) suffered from one of these complications. The benefits included a reduction in bowel cancer and in hip fractures.

There was an estimated 29 percent increased risk for coronary heart disease, 41 percent for stroke, and 26 percent for breast cancer. There was an estimated 37 percent reduced risk of bowel cancer and a 34 percent reduced risk of hip fracture.

The trial was stopped because of the increased breast cancer risk and because the investigators felt that, even if with longer follow up some protection against heart disease was found, it would not be able to sufficiently overcome the increased risk found in the first five years.

Commentary: It should be stressed that the extent of the increased risk for individual women is quite small. There was, indeed, a suggestion that the increased risk of coronary heart disease was mainly in the first two years; it is, therefore, quite possible that some protection would have been found among women taking the estrogen-progestin combination for more than five years.

Here are the issues and problems:

- In the calculation of risks and benefits, the fact that most women take estrogens post menopausally because of hot flashes, emotional stress, and other often very annoying menopausal symptoms was not considered. It is clear that estrogens are the best drugs for those complaints. In this study, risks outweighed benefits by a bit; on the other hand, relief of menopausal symptoms could tilt the equation to benefits outweighing risks for many women being treated for those menopausal complaints.

- This study adds to the evidence from other studies indicating that adding a progestin to estrogen increases the risk of breast cancer and probably neutralizes, at least in part, the beneficial effects of estrogen for the heart. The problem is that, if women take estrogens alone, the risk of uterine cancer is considerably increased; adding the progestin abolishes that risk, but appears to increase the risk of breast cancer to a small extent. Because of the risk of uterine cancer from estrogens alone, the only group of women for whom estrogen alone is recommended are those without a uterus (who have had a hysterectomy).

- The Women’s Health Initiative also had an estrogen alone component. That component has not been stopped because there is no indication harms outweigh benefits. It is quite likely that estrogens given alone will reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and heart attack. Even if that turns out to be the case, estrogens alone will not be recommended because of the risk of uterine cancer (unless the woman has had a hysterectomy). Estrogens alone probably increase the risk of breast cancer a bit for women taking the estrogens for more than five years.

- This study confirms the benefit of estrogens in preventing osteoporosis (bone thinning) and bone fractures. But, here again, estrogens alone will not be recommended because of the risk of uterine cancer. That is a problem for women found to have low bone strength (low bone density). This is called osteopenia. At least 30 percent of women over age 60 suffer from osteopenia. At present, there is no drug that has been proved to prevent bone fractures in osteopenic women; estrogens are probably the best. We do have drugs (such as Fosamax, Actonel, Evista) that can be used in osteoporotic women to reduce fracture risk, but none of these has yet been shown to be effective in fracture prevention in osteopenic women.

- Many experts are now saying that it is reasonably safe to take the estrogen-progestin combination for a few years for menopausal symptoms, but they say treatment for longer than four years is too dangerous. BUT, the increased risk of heart attack and stroke occurs in the first two years after starting estrogen plus progestin. Of course, as noted, the risk of these unpleasant events is small.

Where does that leave us? There are two possible uses for estrogens or estrogen-progestin.

- Menopausal symptoms. If severe, this is still the most effective treatment. Women should try other available, but less effective, drugs. If that does not work, estrogens with progestins (estrogens alone if the uterus has been removed) should be strongly considered realizing there is a small risk of serious side effects, including heart attack, stroke, clots in the legs or elsewhere, and emboli to the lungs. All drugs entail some risk, including aspirin. For those who do decide to take estrogens, a side benefit is better bone strength and, perhaps (not yet proved), reduction in risk of bowel cancer.

- Treatment of low bone density (osteopenia) to prevent osteoporosis and fractures. The evidence here is good. BUT, the definitive study has not yet been completed. The Women’s Health Initiative is the best such study; unfortunately, the women were not studied for bone density prior to the start of the study. There could have been baseline differences in the groups. The dangers, though small, of estrogen or estrogen-progestin treatment are enough to recommend that estrogens or estrogen-progestin not be given to osteopenic women. Newer drugs are being tested. We will just have to be patient until we have effective drugs or until additional studies show drugs already available such as Fosamax, Actonel, or Evista actually do prevent fractures in osteopenic women. For now osteopenic women (indeed, all postmenopausal women) should:

not smoke

exercise regularly

have a calcium intake of at least 1,200 milligrams

be sure their vitamin D intake is adequate

The same issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association has an article that concludes that estrogens, but not estrogen-progestins, increase risk of ovarian cancer by about 60 percent. There are many studies - some show increased risk, some show no effect, some show protection. At present, the risk of ovarian cancer should not be an issue in decision making about estrogen or estrogen-progestin use.

Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women. Journal of the American Medical Association. Vol 288 (July 17) Pgs 321-333. 2002.

 

 
Supported by

UMDNJ Home              Healthful Life Home              Top